[OCCAID] Proposal for EINTAP

[David D.W. Downey]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James [mailto:james at towardex.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 1:23 AM
> To: Miles Nordin
> Cc: occaid at cnacs.occaid.org
> Subject: Re: [OCCAID] Proposal for EINTAP
> 
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:29:05PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
> > >>>>> "tm" == Tom McNeely <tom at cnacs.occaid.org> writes:
> >
> >     tm> http://www.occaid.org/proposals/eintap.txt
> >
> > dnsspam?!
> >
> 
> > Next will that be forbidden too because someone thinks
> > it's unfashionable or childish, or because ``IPv6 addresses were
> > intended as opaque numerals for routing purposes only and were never
> > meant to spell things''?
> 
> Nope. We have nothing against using creative numbering schemes with
> IPv6 numbering plan. But this is DNS issue.
> 
> I think that it is a good move to passively select what users are
> associated with OCCAID.  We have either a class of script kiddies
> or class of people who actually want to do something productive, like
> you, myself and many downstreams of ours.
> 

I am in *total* agreement with James on this issue. I personally feel it
marks the organization or company associated with it. There is no need for
DNS spam, and this is a private network for learning, not a kiddie park.

--
David pgpkeys Downey