[OCCAID] Proposal for EINTAP

[James]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM -0500, Neil wrote:
> 
> but then again, since occaid has layer 10 problems, i am not credible.
> oh well, NANOG friends used to say "its just IRC" ;-) or was it that 
> TCAM is for layer 2 mac addresses? last i recall there was difference
> between binary CAM and ternary CAM but anyways.. good night folks
> 
> 	-ndf

Folks,

Please, let us stop the hate war here, there is no need for this. All we
see here are two side of political arguments and nothing changed as far as
network is concerned.

I'd ask those involved here to look at the proposal I sent in the other
email today and let's see how everyone likes that. More flame baits like
this one doesn't help the issue, but just fans the flames. We don't need to
waste our time like this.

Thank you,

-J

-- 
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Technical Lead                      Boston IPv4/IPv6 Web Hosting, Colocation and
james at towardex.com            Network design/consulting & configuration services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net