[OCCAID] Proposal for EINTAP

[James]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:52:11AM -0500, James wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:39:52AM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >      j> All we see here are two side of political arguments and
> >      j> nothing changed as far as network is concerned.
> > 
> > Yeah, and nothing will change, because our input doesn't mean jack.
> > Maybe you should just stop posting EINTAP policy here.  Just implement
> > it and tell us.  Clearly I'm not qualified to have an opinion---I'm
> > just a member of a vocal minority who see all the name-calling and
> > become afraid their tunnels will be delayed if they speak up.

On other note, I think there was a sense of unprofessionalism on
Scott's part to simply enact it into policy without listening to
opinions from others. Which is why I offered another revision to the
"proposal" b/c it really wasn't a proposal when other people's opinions
were not heard. But I guess it won't make much difference now..

As far as "tunnels being delayed", that is not true but I do understand
the concerns you have in mind.

If you have problems with tunnel or other provisioning due to differences of
opinions, you are welcome to bring that to my attention in private and I will
deal with that.

Thanks,
-J

-- 
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Technical Lead                      Boston IPv4/IPv6 Web Hosting, Colocation and
james at towardex.com            Network design/consulting & configuration services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net