[OCCAID] Proposal for EINTAP

[Miles Nordin]

>>>>> "j" == James  <james at towardex.com> writes:

     j> If you have problems with tunnel or other provisioning due to
     j> differences of opinions, you are welcome to bring that to my
     j> attention in private and I will deal with that.

thanks. :' I wasn't worried about anything like that myself since I've
been around a few months and know how fast you guys are, but at least
one guy wrote me privately, and refused to post in public when I
asked, with that reason.  This left me frustrated since I am left
hanging out here, so I wanted to say very unhypothetically to my
``tiny minority tooth and nail'' friend, don't presume to go about
counting heads when real ballots are secret for a reason.

It was probably a little over the top for me to bring that up without
a context/disclaimer when you have been so consistently responsive
even on a community project where there is no reason to expect it.
sorry.

     j> It had been made clear(? or I may not have :-( ) by me that
     j> existing members like yourself and others will not be migrated
     j> to EINTAP unless they want to.

Yeah, I understood that---it was bad composition on my part.  I was
just trying to finish saying something positive: that it actually does
sound like a good plan, and also, I'm not just saying that because it
only affects other people.