[OCCAID] Proposal for EINTAP

[Tristan Santore]

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> Tristan Santore wrote:
>
>> following this for a last week or so, despite my objections to the
>> dnsspam rule, people seem to be
>
>
> Let's do it this way .. no more IRC access over v6 from the occaid v6 
> tunnel network (lots of tunnel providers like he.net and freenet6.net 
> already do this)
>
> If the IRC kiddies don't get IRC over v6 they won't come bugging 
> occaid for v6 access.
>
> And the rest of us who want cool looking DNS names (even 0x.dead.beef 
> type stuff) can go right ahead.
>
>     srs
>
Dear Suresh,
Id be very much obliged, if u could post my whole message as a reply 
next time to point out
all points I have made. Also I would like to point out that IRC can 
actually be useful, too.
Not to mention the various help channels on tech matters or chatting to 
work colleagues or
other techies/techie friends in other work places. Just a little pointer.

The EINTAP agreement has nothing to do with a discussion on to block of 
irc or other services or not. Its a guideline document for people who 
will offer others to connect via them to the OCCAID network, offloading 
stress on the backbone, and also easing the burden on the people behind 
OCCAID. Hence this EINTAP outline was created.

Kind regards,
Tristan